Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Concurrent Engineering
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agouridas, V.
Right arrow Articles by Race, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enhancing Knowledge Management in Design Education Through Systematic Reflection Practice

Vassilis Agouridas

School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; v.agouridas{at}leeds.ac.uk

Phil Race

Staff and Departmental Development Unit University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

The significant role of reflection in sustaining the quality of learning and teaching (L&T) activities at high levels has been widely acknowledged in literature. Reflection has been identified as a key factor underpinning both successful learning by students and successful continuing professional development by their teaching staff in higher education. This study focuses on aspects associated with the individual reflection practice of teaching staff. It is proposed and maintained that the establishment of systematic reflection practice has a central role in enhancing knowledge management in design education. To this end, the consistency and coherence, in which key perspectives of reflection are considered and evidenced by teaching staff, need to be both ensured and sustained. Reflection Space is introduced as an approach to support the establishment of systematic1, evidenced2, and traceable reflection practice. It is a means of representing the nature, or perspectives, of reflection required on L&T and it has been applied and evaluated to a number of L&T contexts. An application of Reflection Space is demonstrated through a case study that dealt with the development of a Design Studio module delivered to Year 2 Product Design students. Evaluation of the application has shown that use of Reflection Space during the reflection phase of L&T activities can ensure that key reflective perspectives of L&T have been considered and evidenced. As a result, actions for the enhancement and/or improvement of the deployed L&T activities can be determined in a systematic, evidenced, and traceable manner.

Key Words: reflection space • evidencing reflection • learning and teaching • design studio

Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 1, 63-76 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X07076267


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?