Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Concurrent Engineering
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lan, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Kang, C.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Constrained Spatial Layout and Simultaneous Production Evaluation for a Production System

Chun-Hsiung Lan

Graduate Institute of Management Sciences, Nanhua University, 622 Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan, R.O.C., chlan{at}mail.nhu.edu.tw

Chung-Jen Kang

Graduate Institute of Management Sciences, Nanhua University, 622 Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan, R.O.C.

This paper proposes a mathematical model called Multi-objective Production System Design (MOPSD) model and a two-staged solving procedure. The MOPSD model not only considers the two-dimensional layout of a production system under the constrained factory space to achieve the minimal total material transportation flow but also determines the optimal assigned number of workstations and the optimal system cycle time concerning a simultaneous production situation. The first major objective of MOPSD model is regarded as a Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP), but it considers the size of operation element, the multiple production lines, and the constrained two-dimensional factory space where traditional QAP studies are seldom mentioned. The second objective of the MOPSD model is to determine the optimal system cycle time as well as the optimal assigned number of workstations under the simultaneous production situation for preventing the underestimation of the system production rate.

The first-stage solving procedure of the MOPSD model applies the space discrete technique to make the infinite deployable locations become finite, and then one can achieve the major objective through the system layout. In addition, the Four Position Coding Technique (FPCT) is developed to code the nodes in the deployed production system obtaining from the first stage, and therefore those FPCT codes can function as the input parameters in the second-stage solving procedure. These two solving procedures are constructed by the syntax of Lingo 9.0 extended version, and a numerical example is followed to describe the detailed solving procedure. In summary, the repeated characteristic of the MOPSD model and its solving procedure make this study a valuable decision support tool because they are constructed by the packaged software Lingo 9.0. That is, a factory can easily duplicate to solve other cases by changing its input parameters only.

Key Words: QAP • FPCT • space discrete • Lingo 9.0 • cycle time

Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 2, 111-120 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X06065529


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?